K then class, lets review.
The cbr600RR is an awesome bike. It has more than enough power for the street and is really in its element on the track.
The cbr600RR should be ridden like a bat out of hell in order to get the right amount of airflow across the radiator.
I think this one is still being debated all across cbr600rr.com even now. The cbr600RR can be ridden 2-up as much as is necessary. 2-up riding does change the performance envelope of the bike greatly however. The suspension of the bike is affected by the extra weight over the rear axle and the bike requires the pilot to maintain high rpms to induce stability back into the suspension and chasis. 10,000 rpms seems to be necessary to gain the proper amount of take off acceleration from a dead stop.
The CBR1000RR is just too much bike for all but the seasoned professional and the not so well endowed fellows that need the 400 extra cc's to compensate for the 4" they are lacking.
The CBR1000RR is not nearly as stable in the twisties, is far more touchy on corner exits, and seems to have a problem with wheelspin and a very light front end.
If you give your cbr600RR NOS, it will revolt and kill you? Huh?
Fretless33 has a pink power ranger suit.
Lots o chrome = lots o chicks.
Oz is Keith Codes disciple.
2old2fat2slow can legally visit two forums cause he has 2 cbr's a 600 and a 1000. NICE
Thank everybody that contributed to this thread. My initial intent was to get the opinions of people that I KNEW had ridden both and chose to ride the 600. I have read this thread about 10 times from font to end and have gleaned all the information that you all have left. This has been great fun and I think OZ and Fret need to get together and
. Oz dude, you know you will be catching flak from this for a while dont you?
